When the WHO declared a global health pandemic in early 2020, governments around the globe worked in lockstep to respond. Mainstream TV, radio and newspaper channels were funded by governments and large corporations, to report policies and mandates which we were told were necessary to protect us all from a deadly virus.
But there is no doubt that the Covid19 response measures imposed by our governments, have led to numerous domestic and international human rights violations, and caused significant damage to people’s physical, mental, financial, and social well-being. Evidence of the damage caused, is expanding every week, as more and more people raise concerns, and more and more medical experts, scientists and economists speak out with real world data.
But as you will see on review of some of the supporting evidence provided on this website, sadly, many of these experts who are speaking out about the dangers of the vaccines and other government measures, have been 'silenced' in various ways by governments, mainstream media and big tech companies. You may be aware of the files recently exposed by Twitter, which revealed significant coercion by various government agencies such as the FBI, who pressured Twitter management to remove accounts of experts who posted factual information that the government did not want you to see. This is why many people have only heard the 'narrative' agreed by governments and big corporations globally.
Some of the impacts of the pandemic response, will not be fully known for decades, as there is no way of knowing the long-term health effects of the experimental vaccines that people were coerced to take, nor the long-term impacts of lockdowns and other measures, on the development and social well-being of our children and young people.
This website seeks to provide information to answer the 6 key questions below, in relation to the Covid19 pandemic and the response of governments around the world
1. Was there really a‘pandemic’– what were the risks of Covid 19, who were at risk, and were there any treatments available?
2. Are the Covid 19 vaccinessafe?
3. Are the Covid 19 vaccineseffective?
4. Werepandemic responsessuch as testing, masking, social distancing, lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations effective, and the only way out?
5. Should westop the vaccinesnow and end all Covid related restrictions?
6. What are the future impactslikely to come from the pandemic response measures?
Based on the facts listed below and your own investigations, you can draw your own conclusions as to whether the WHO declared the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’ because of a serious threat to global health, or whether there may have been other motives for this declaration, which our governments used to take unprecedented levels of control over our livelihoods, our personal health choices and our way of life.
Before you start reviewing the facts below in detail, consider the information in the graphic below for a minute. The data in the graph shown is extracted from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and Our World in Data, and although it covers Australia only, it gives a pretty good overview of the true risk of Covid-19 to people's lives around the world.
You can easily recreate this graph for your own country by checking your country's official statistics website and the 'Our World in Data' website.
You may also be interested to know that based on analysis of blood samples in storage, scientists found evidence that Covid-19 was circulating in Italy and many other countries as far back as August 2019; yet no-one really noticed, as it was not 'spreading' at alarming rates, and people were being successfully treated where necessary, as they would be for any other Covid illness, such as a bad Flu.
It is interesting that Covid-19 only became of concern, after it was 'announced', 8 months later in March 2020, by the WHO as being a 'pandemic', and the media and governments worldwide began their campaign to induce fear in the world population.
You may not be aware that hundreds of millions of people have been concerned (and protesting) worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic, about the measures being enforced by their governments. Many share the view of the gentleman in the following video clip from Fox news, that it seems like 'something else is going on here'.
'SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON': Dr. Fauci confronted by DC residents on vaccines
The survival rate for the flu across all ages is 99.998%, while the survival rate for Covid-19 is 99.99%.
To help understand the true fatality of a disease, we look at the infection fatality rate (IFR). The IFR represents the proportion of the people who die following an infection with SARS-COV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19). As you will see at the first link listed under "Supporting Evidence" below (which further links to official US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organisation (WHO) data), the IFR of Covid-19 is very close to the IFR of Influenza (the Flu).
So why was a global pandemic called, with a response that was so significantly different to the way in which we deal with the Flu every year? Why did our government leaders and the mainstream media keep telling us that Covid-19 was so deadly, and that we needed to take such drastic measures to control it?
We have been living with corona viruses for decades. Colds and Flus are all “corona viruses” and our ability to recover from the virus depends on our own natural immune system.
It has always been the case that some people can, and do, die from these Corona viruses, if they have a weak immune system. Those with a weak immune system typically include elderly people and people of any age with serious underlying health conditions. The same demographic of people who die from influenza, like the elderly or those with other health conditions, die from Covid-19. In fact the statistics clearly show that most of the people who died from Covid-19 across the globe, were over the age of life expectancy, and had an average of 2 to 3 other serious health issues (co-morbidities).
Real World Evidence in February 2020 - The Diamond Princess:
There was clear data about the infection and fatality rate of Covid-19 in February 2020 when the Diamond Princess, a British-registered luxury and cruise ship, during a cruise of the Western Pacific, detected cases of COVID-19 on board. The vessel was quarantined off Japan for two weeks, after which all remaining passengers and crew were evacuated. Of the 3,711 people on board, 712 became infected with the virus – 567 of 2,666 passengers, and 145 of 1,045 crew. Figures for total deaths vary from early to later assessments, and because of difficulties in establishing causation. As many as 14 are reported to have died from the virus, all of them older passengers.
For anyone who has been on a cruise ship you would understand that this is the perfect breeding ground for the spread of a virus due to the extremely small and close living quarters and common areas for passengers. Also, the age range of passengers is generally heavily skewed to the older population, who are much more susceptible to severe outcomes from a virus. So the spread of Covid-19 in such an environment is likely to be a 'worst-case scenario' for transmission. Yet even in this scenario, less than 20% of those on board caught Covid-19 and of those, no more than 14 died - an overall mortality rate for those infected of 2%, but an overall mortality rate of about one-third of 1 % or a 99.6% recovery. And bear in mind that this would likely be much less in the general community with many more younger people who were not living in such close contact.
Why weren't we told about Vitamin D?
But the above facts about Covid-19 having a fatality rate and demographic impact similar to a bad Flu season, and that adequate Vitamin D levels can help to avoid infection or serious outcomes, is NOT what the mainstream media (MSM) reported. All over the world, the MSM in lockstep, reported the same horror stories of high case numbers, overwhelmed hospitals, and a high number of deaths. But what they did not tell you is how the data was manipulated to enable these horror stories to be created.
Manipulation of the Data to create FEAR:
Below are just some examples of how they 'created' the horror statistics that were used to induce fear in the global population:
1. The PCR test used to diagnose infection was not accurate and produced a high number of false positive results, which significantly overstated the number of true cases of infection (see separate FACT on this issue).
2. In the beginning of the pandemic, most countries were counting any death of someone who had Covid-19, as a 'Covid death'. So if someone was already dying of another disease; or went to hospital after an accident; or had numerous other illnesses, any one of which might have been their cause of death; when these people arrived at hospital, they were immediately tested for Covid. If the PCR test which cannot accurately diagnose any disease, showed they were positive, Covid-19 was listed as the cause of death on their death certificate and reported by the media in the total of Covid death numbers.
This manipulation of the death numbers was uncovered when a man died of a gunshot wound, but tested positive for Covid-19 when he arrived at hospital, so he was counted as a 'Covid-19' death. Once the public became aware of this manipulative reporting of the numbers, governments changed their reporting method, and started reporting those who died 'from' Covid, instead of those who died 'with' Covid.
Do you remember that change in language? It happened simultaneously around the world, but most people would not have noticed. But pay careful attention in future for this distinction in the language, when listening to reports or reviewing Covid-19 hospitalization and death data, as it is very significant to understanding the true risk and impact of Covid-19 on the health of nations.
3. See the report from Finland under supporting evidence below, exposing the fraudulent Covid-19 death count. According to Sirkka Goebeler, chief specialist at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Covid-19 has not been the actual cause of death in up to 40 percent of fatalities attributed to the illness in Finland. The article goes on to say: "The Finnish report further substantiates the complaints of statistical analysts and public health experts that there was a failure to differentiate between deaths from Covid and deaths with Covid during the pandemic. There is evidence that in the United States the conflation was deliberate in order to drive and perpetuate a state of public alarm. The most obvious red flags were that approximately 95% of Covid mortalities had multiple serious co-morbidities and the average age of death was around life expectancy. CDC statistics show that 95% of Covid-related deaths list an average of 4 comorbidities, while 5% list Covid as the only known cause of death. Such co-morbidities include cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), and cancer (5.6%). The average age of Covid-related death is 77 years old."
4. It took 3 years, but some mainstream media has finally started reporting the truth that the Covid deaths have been overcounted. Please see The Washington Post op-ed published on January 13, 2023 titled "We are over-counting covid deaths and hospitalisations. That's a problem". The columnist writes "We are overcounting COVID deaths....Since every hospitalized patient gets tested for COVID....a gunshot victim or someone who had a heart attack, for example, could test positive...".
Given how long this fact has been known, it begs the question as to why it took the MSM 3 years to report this very crucial fact, as it was the high death rate being reported by the MSM which generated the fear amongst the public, and which was a key reason that the WHO declared a pandemic.
5. There have been numerous examples reported in many countries of how the Covid-19 infection, hospitalisation and death data is being manipulated by governments and the MSM, to support the Covid-19 narrative, not just in relation to the risks of infection, but also the claim that the vaccines are 'safe and effective' (see further FACTS on these topics on this website).
One such report can be found in the video below by former Australian MP Craig Kelly in January 2023 "Statistical Fraud by NSW Health".
Mr. Kelly states "Embarrassed by the data showing our hospitals were full of quadruple vaxxed people with Covid and not a single vaccine free person was in hospital with Covid-19, NSW Health decided to hide the data by no longer reporting it in their weekly Covid Surveillance Reports. And now they have resorted to statistical fraud in their 'hospitalisation by vaccine status' reporting by combining the 'unvaccinated' and 'no information' categories together. This is despite NSW Health previously stating that those in hospitalised and in 'no information' category as to their vaccination status "are likely to have received at least one dose". So this both hides the fact that there are zero unvaccinated people in hospital with Covid and understates the percentage of the quadruple vaccinated in hospital. Its' a complete sham by vaccine fanatics that refuse to admit their assertions of 'safe & effective' was a lie, that are now deliberately trying to mislead the public."
6. None of the MSM reporting on Covid-19 death, hospitalisation and infection rates was ever compared to other causes of illness and death. For example, google how many people are hospitalized each year in your country and from what causes. Or research how many people die in your country each year, or each day, and from what causes. Then compare those numbers to the Covid-19 hospitalization and death numbers that you were hearing in the news. You will find that there are other causes of death much higher than Covid-19 that our health authorities should have been far more focused on than Covid-19, especially since most Covid-19 deaths were in people who were older than life expectancy age, and /or who had multiple other serious health conditions. For example, in the UK, before Covid, about 600,000 people died each year or about 1,700 per day from all causes. Compare that to the number of people who died 'from' Covid (not 'with' Covid) which you can find within the information at links below.
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
- Reference for Covid vs Flu survival rate
- Finland Exposes nearly 40% of Reported Covid Deaths were Fraudulent
- May 2020 - Covid-19 is a Statistical Nonsense
- Jan 2023 - We are overcounting deaths and hospitalizations. That's a problem.
- Dr. Robert Malone - Annual Flu Vaccine Program Is Built On A Lie
USEFUL LINKS:
Man Shot Dead Counted and Reported as Covid Death
January 2023 - Former Australian MP Craig Kelly - Statistical Fraud by NSW Health
If you believe the vaccines are not safe, you may wish to consider following the advice of world leading cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough below, which is 'don't take any more shots' and express your concerns to your doctor, because "the doctors need to hear that 30 times a day before they start to get the message that the population doesn't think they're safe".
Fortunately many countries started to withdraw recommendations for vaccines in children in late 2022; and in April 2023, Switzerland withdrew Covid vaccine recommendations for all ages. If these vaccines are so 'safe and effective', why are some countries withdrawing them?
March 2023 - World Leading Cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough - Don't Take Any More Shots!
You need to seriously consider how much you can trust information and drug trial results that are published by a drug company about their own products, from which they have made tens of billions of dollars in profits. They are very unlikely to publish any negative safety results or tell you that their products don’t really work very well, as that would reduce their sales and profits. Companies don’t exist to protect you and your family, they exist solely to make profits for their shareholders or owners.
Did you know that big pharmaceutical companies, some of whom are currently selling Covid-19 vaccines, have a history of paying billions of dollars in damages to people harmed and killed by their products? The courts ordered payment of these damages because the evidence showed that the companies knew that the products were unsafe, but they sold them anyway. This is likely because they did a 'cost benefit analysis' and determined that the cost of any lawsuits would be much less than the profits they would make from the sales.
As the saying goes, “if you want to know what is really going on, follow the money; if you want to know the truth, look to those who are being silenced”.
Please see several articles and videos below that provide some insight into how Big Pharma operates, to help you form your own opinion as to how much you are prepared to trust them with the health and lives of you and your family.
The video below of Robert F Kennedy Jr. interviewing UK Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra is particularly interesting, as they discuss Dr Malhotra's recent research on the Covid-19 vaccines, including the role of big Pharma throughout the pandemic and in its influence over the Health system in general.
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:- How Big Pharma Pushes Dangerous Drugs and Reaps Profits
- Pfizers's history of Fraud and Corruption
- US Justice Department Announces Largest Healthcare Fraud Settlement in its' History
- Covid-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Report
- Dr Aseem Malhotra: Pfizer's Raw Data shows Significant Harm - Pfizer Senior Execs and Scientists Must Have Known This
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr: Evidence Based Medicine with Dr Aseem Malhotra
USEFUL LINKS:
How Corrupt is Big Pharma - Dr Aseem Malhotra - Leading UK Cardiologist
Dr Peter Gotzsche Exposes Big Pharma as Organized Crime
We Have A Complete Healthcare System Failure - Dr Malhotra - Sep 2022
Former Pharma Rep - Dispells Myth that Pharma Wants to Cure People
Dr Pierre Kory on Ivermectin and How Big Pharma Corrupted Science
After viewing the information presented by Andrew Bridgen below on the effectiveness and risks of the Covid vaccines (which is consistent with government data in most other countries of the world), reading the other facts and information on this website, and undertaking your own investigations, you can draw your own conclusions as to whether you believe the vaccines are 'effective'.
Dr John Campbell: Speech by UK MP Andrew Bridgen in UK Parliament - March 2023
For 2 years the entire world population was told by their governments, mainstream media channels and high-profile celebrities, that we ALL needed to get vaccinated to stop the transmission of Covid-19. Perfectly healthy children, and young and middle-aged adults, all of whom were at either no risk, or an extremely low risk, of serious outcomes from contracting Covid 19, were told that they needed to get vaccinated for the sake of the elderly and those in our society who were vulnerable to serious outcomes.
Many people were not prepared to take the experimental gene therapies which were labelled as 'vaccines', as they were concerned that there had not been enough time for these new drugs to be adequately tested for safety and effectiveness (efficacy). Many people also understood, that for healthy people, their own natural immunity has always been the best defense against disease. Therefore, their personal health choice was not to take a new, experimental drug which could have either immediate, or long term, side effects that were not yet known.
Did anyone ask Granny whether she wanted her healthy children and grandchildren to risk unknown side effects of an experimental jab, in her name? Please see the video "This is how we treated Granny" in the link under Supporting Evidence and decide for yourself whether you think the pandemic measures were the best way to protect Granny.
But instead of allowing people to exercise their own medical freedom in democratic countries, government leaders and health regulators around the world led the cry for these people to be discriminated against, with extreme measures including 'vaccine passports' and 'vaccine mandates' that ensured the unvaccinated were in many cases excluded from society, unable to work, unable to travel and in many cases 'locked down' in their homes or government mandated quarantine facilities. Consequently, millions of people around the world lost their jobs, their homes, their families and their friends. And in poorer countries, many people literally starved to death as they were not able to leave their homes to get food.
Never forget that we were all told that these measures were necessary in order to exclude those people who chose not to take an experimental vaccine which our governments, media and celebrities ASSURED US would 'stop the spread' of Covid 19.
It became pretty obvious within weeks of the vaccine rollout that these drugs did NOT prevent people from catching or transmitting Covid-19, as the vaccinated population continued to contract Covid-19, in many cases multiple times. But instead of reviewing the measures taken to manage the pandemic, governments in democratic countries 'doubled down' on measures that clearly were not working, with a second shot, then a booster, then another booster and even more extreme measures, all in a desperate attempt to coerce everyone to take the new experimental drugs in order to 'stop the spread'.
Hundreds of millions of people worldwide protested, whilst a disproportionately high number of vaccinated people continued to fill up hospital wards, and yet instead of listening to the protestors and looking at the data and science that was available, governments became more forceful in their push to vaccinate the entire population, silencing world renowned scientists and doctors from all countries, who dared to speak out and raise any concerns about the risks and ineffectiveness of both the vaccines and the policies.
Furthermore, the worldwide cry from political leaders was that this was a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated', even though the data from government databases globally proved that this simply was not even close to being true. This new call from government leaders, further deepened the divide between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, breaking down families and communities even further.
In October 2022, a senior Pfizer executive finally admitted under question in the EU parliament, that Pfizer had not even tested the so-called Covid 19 'vaccine' for transmission of the virus. Please see various reports on this in the supporting evidence below. All government regulators who approved the Pfizer vaccine, knew that it had not been tested against stopping the spread of Covid 19, as this was clear from the trial data provided to the regulators prior to the emergency use approval of the new drugs in each country. So why did our governments and mainstream media blatantly lie to us, and discriminate against the unvaccinated based on this very big lie, a lie which destroyed millions of lives around the world?
An executive from AstraZeneca was also specifically questioned in EU parliament about whether their vaccine was tested to stop the transmission. They did not answer the question, but instead said that a paper published in the Lancet proved that the vaccines had saved 20 million lives. But an article in a journal doesn't prove anything. The data from governments, as well as Health and Life Insurance companies all over the world, do not provide any evidence that any lives were saved by the Covid-19 vaccines. Please watch the video below to form your own opinion as to whether the executive from Astra Zeneca was being truthful and transparent in her response to the EU MEP.
Please also read information outlined under other facts on this website for further details of why the vaccines did not protect the elderly and the vulnerable. The supporting evidence below also includes links to articles and videos that show various data and statistics in relation to the effectiveness of the Covid 19 'vaccines', to assist you in your own assessment of the effectiveness of these experimental products.
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
- Pfizer didn't even test to see if vaccine prevented transmission
- South Australian Senator questions Australian Chief Medical Officer on effectiveness of Pfizer vaccine, Paul Kelly Lied!
- AstraZeneca questioned by EU MEP on whether vaccine was tested for transmission
- This Is How We Treated Granny
USEFUL LINKS:
This is how we treated Granny during the Pandemic
You can form your own conclusions about the effectiveness of the government response to the pandemic after reviewing the following facts and information, and conducting your own further research of the data, evidence and concerns being put forward by many experts, frontline healthworkers, educators, parents and well informed men and women, most of whom were 'silenced' throughout the pandemic.
You may wish to consider the information in the video below of Dr Jay Bhattacharya, one of the world leading epidemiologists who was co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration, which was a proposed response to the pandemic, authored by global scientists and medical experts who recommended a very different, and as it turns out, more appropriate, response to the pandemic. See more about the Great Barrington Declaration in the facts below.
But also consider the information in the video below by Dr Chris Shoemaker, which begs the question why a pandemic was called, when scientists already had a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses.
Dr Jay Bhattacharya - They LIED! There was NOT a Scientific Consensus on ANY of the Pandemic Response Measures
Dr Chris Shoemaker - Scientists spent 15 years to find that Ivermectin was a safe and effective treatment for Corona viruses
Prior to the Covid-19 Pandemic, World Health Organization (WHO) experts analyzed the scientific literature and drafted recommendations for pandemic management.
Please see under supporting evidence below 'The WHO Review And Why It Matters To You', for a detailed analysis of whether the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) deployed during the Covid-19 pandemic, were in line with the 2019 WHO pandemic management recommendations. On page 6 of this document, you will find the following summary of the recommendations made by the WHO in 2019.
These same recommendations were included in the 'Pandemic Plans' of many countries at the time of the Covid outbreak, and these recommendations were accepted in late 2019 as the best science available.
When you compare the list of policies adopted by most countries around the world throughout the Covid pandemic, you may be surprised to see that none of the recommendations that were accepted as best practice, science-based responses, were followed. In fact, in most cases the exact opposite approach was enforced.
Please read the full analysis for yourself in this well researched and easy to read paper. You can then decide for yourself how many of the government policies and measures to address Covid were based on 'the science' and whether they really were in the best interests of our health, and the best way to deal with the pandemic.
Please also see the short video 'Jordon Peterson on The Pandemic' in the link below, where he states:
"I have had conversations with people advising at the highest levels of government, particularly in Canada, who have told me flat out, and they are very reliable sources, that NONE of the Covid policy for the last year was driven by reliance on science, its ALL opinion poll..."
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
These calls are increasing every day, with many ethical politicians from countries all over the world, as well as tens of thousands of doctors, scientists, and lawyers, also demanding that these measures not only be stopped, but that government enquiries be held into:
- the very high level of 'excess deaths' occurring in all highly vaccinated countries;
- vaccine injuries and deaths; and
- other impacts from the Covid-19 response measures.
See below one of many such calls from government MPs around the world, from Australian Senator Gerard Rennick, in his speech to the Australian Senate in March 2023.
Fortunately, calls are being heard in some countries, with Switzerland having withdrawn all Covid vaccine recommendations in early April 2023.
Please read more facts below, which include other videos and links to the many cries from around the world to stop the vaccines and end all Covid-19 related measures and restrictions.
Within months of the mass vaccination rollout for Covid-19 vaccines, statisticians and insurance companies began reporting alarming increases in 'Excess Deaths', most prominently in highly vaccinated countries.
Excess deaths are those deaths over and above what would be expected, based on average deaths over prior years. Statisticians can very reliably predict the number of deaths in any given year, which is why this significant increase, which coincided with the rollout of the Covid vaccines, is so alarming.
Ed Dowd, who is a former Blackrock Executive, first began reporting these statistics, as did some of the world's largest health insurance companies, which started seeing a very big increase in payouts for deaths of young, working aged people. The data he reports is backed up by data from insurance companies, as well as the fact that the funeral business is booming (not related to Covid deaths).
Some Politicians started to raise alarms about the safety of the experimental vaccines not long after the rollout commenced, and as the pattern of excess deaths became clearer, they also raised concerns about whether these excess deaths may be related to the vaccines.
On 11 Oct 2022 a Press Conference held by 6 European MEPS, specifically raised the issue of excess deaths across Europe.
As you will see at the link below under supporting evidence, MEP Cristian Tehreș reported that according to Eurostat data, in July 2022 the excess mortality rate in the EU was 16% higher compared to the average of 2016-2019.
He also pointed out that if you look at the map, the countries with the highest vaccination rates currently have the highest excess mortality rate.
He asks the question whether these excess deaths could be caused by the vaccines, as they are not Covid-19 deaths. But, as MEP Tehres points out, "everyone is avoiding asking this logical question".
Croatian MEP Mislav Kolakusic breaks the figures down further (see link below). He explains that the excess deaths in July 2022 for various countries were Croatia 14.6%, Italy 24.9%, Portugal 28.8%, Greece 31.2%, Spain 36.9%, Iceland 55.8%, Romania 2.4% and Bulgaria 1.4%.
He further explains that there is a big difference in vaccination rates between the countries, with Iceland 83% vaccinated, Romania 42% and Bulgaria only 30%. So it is undeniable that those countries with the lowest vaccination rates had by far the lowest excess deaths of only 2.4% and 1.4%, compared to Iceland with the highest vaccination rate experiencing a 55.8% excess death rate.
The issue of excess deaths is very concerning and remains an ongoing issue. You will find various alarming statistics reported in the articles below.
It is unfathomable as to why governments and regulators around the world are refusing to investigate the cause of these excess deaths. It is also alarming that the timing of 'waves' of these excess deaths, coincide with vaccine and booster rollouts, and yet the regulators are not investigating if there is a link to the vaccines. Meanwhile many governments around the world continue to tell their people that the vaccines are 'safe and effective,' and that we should continue to line up for our next shot.
Do you think your government should investigate the causes of these excess deaths? These are not just statistics, these are people's mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, cousins, aunts, uncles, and friends. Don't the people deserve to know what is causing so many people to die so young, since the introduction of the Covid vaccines?
Please go to the links and video below for more information.
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:
- Comparison of Excess Deaths in Australia and Other OECD Countries
- The Funeral business is booming - and NOT because of Covid
- Mislav Kolakusic - Croatian MEP - EU faces huge increase in Excess Mortality Rates in 2022
- European MEP Cristian Tehres Press Conference on Excess Deaths
Former Blackrock Exec Ed Dowd on Excess Deaths in Working Age reported by Insurance Companies - September 2022
With the third anniversary of the Covid lockdowns and the amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations currently being proposed, PANDA organization has collated the video below (link also provided), of responses that the public provided to the WHO.
We cannot yet fully know the future impacts that will ensue due to the Covid pandemic response measures over the last 3 years, but the responses at the link and video below provide some insight into the suffering and devastation that has already been caused.
Further details of objections to the WHO's power grab is also contained in further Facts below, including details of an international group of lawyers who have joined forces to oppose the WHO's actions.
Link to: The Objectors - Voices from the WHO's Pandemic Preparedness Hearings
The long term impact of the vaccine injuries and deaths will likely be significant if governments and regulators around the world don’t start investigating the significant increase in excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries, and the huge number of ‘deaths from unknown causes’ that started to appear in 2021 (the year the C19 vaccine rollout commenced), to determine whether or not they are in fact being caused by the C19 vaccines, and then focusing their efforts on finding treatments and cures for those who have been injured.
The treatments and cures must be provided by independent, ethical doctors with no government bias or conflicts of interest. Our health systems have clearly failed us all over the last 3 years, so new systems and solutions directed and managed by ethical, experienced, capable medical experts, need to be established.
Based on the number of deaths and serious injuries from the vaccines reported in numerous government databases globally, many people, including members of parliaments around the world, are already labelling the Covid-19 vaccine rollouts as "Crimes Against Humanity". See video below of German EU MP Christine Anderson, speaking on this issue in the European Parliament.
Sadly, many of those who were injured by the vaccines, were coerced or pressured to take a vaccine that they did not want or need; in many cases with the threat of loss of their job and income if they did not. To date, we have only been able to find one apology from a government leader for this abuse of human rights (see video below).
Throughout the pandemic, tens of thousands of ethical, knowledgeable frontline doctors and nurses, as well as scientific experts, and concerned citizens, have formed organizations to help the vaccine injured.
Please see links below to some organizations who may be able to support you or your loved ones, if you are vaccine injured or concerned about the long-term effects of the vaccines. You will also find many support groups on social media platforms, and other medical groups in your country, as C19 vaccine injury is not rare.
Many countries also have vaccine injury compensation programs, so you should also check with your own government, to find out whether such a scheme exists in your country, as it may provide you with some financial support. Don't you think it is ironic that the very same governments who assured its people that the Covid vaccines were 'safe and effective'', have injury compensation programs in place? The very existence of such programs clearly shows that government regulators knew full well from the outset of the vaccination program, that the vaccines had the potential to cause injury and death.
As more and more evidence is being exposed in mainstream news channels, some are calling for 'amnesty' for those who committed the crimes that led to the death and injury of so many people, and the devastation of communities and economies around the world. But those who knew the truth from very early on in the pandemic because they WERE following the science, but were silenced, clearly say NO AMNESTY - we owe it to all humanity to ensure that we are NOT going to let them get away with it. Please see the video below narrated by Tess Lawrie from the World Council for Health.
USEFUL LINKS: