Dr Roy Spencer, formerly a senior scientist for climate studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre, told Sky News Australia that his global temperature dataset which he started with John Christy in 1979, is unlike any other dataset, because it contains data measured from satellites and “covers the whole Earth”.

In the video at the link below Dr Spencer states that “if we do an apples-to-apples comparison between the satellite measurements and what over two dozen climate models have predicted since 1979, for that same layer (troposphere), our measurements, are actually at the bottom end of all those models,” he said.

“In other words, the warming we see is lower than most, if not all, of those models. So there is a discrepancy between what the observations are showing, which shows about an average of 0.13 degrees Celsius per decade warming, which is a very small number compared to the climate models which are generally twice that at least.”

Whilst this would likely be considered 'good news' by most, Dr Spencer goes on to explain that Google has now de-monetised his website where he shares his data with the public.

Dr Spencer said Google was "not specific about what claims" led to the decision. “What their website (google) tells me is that all of my whole website basically is unreliable and harmful claims,” he said. “If people like myself don’t buy into the narrative that global warming is not only occurring, but it’s going on at a catastrophic rate and we have to do something about it, if you don’t go along with that narrative, you get thrown under the bus.”

You may not be aware that Dr Spencer is just one of many climate scientists globally who do not fully align with the 'global warming crisis' that the self elected World Economic Forum (WEF), our governments, and the media, keep warning us about.  These scientists are generally being 'silenced' by the media or big tech in one way or another. 

It is important to ask why the media and big tech go to such lengths to control or limit the information that we are permitted to see.

You may wish to do your own further research on other scientists who have different data and opinions on the global climate change narrative, as the catastrophic predictions being pushed by the mainstream media, underpin many government policies including policies around energy and food security. 

The impacts of some of these policies are already having catastrophic impacts on mankind today, in the name of saving us from predicted crises in the future, based on unproven data models. 

Would you agree that the best way to get to the truth is to allow all scientists and experts to speak freely and be heard, so that healthy scientific debate can allow us to determine the best policies for both the present and the future?  Or are you comfortable that the global elites, big tech and the media are the ones who decide what information you get to see or hear?

LINK:

1. Feb 2022: Dr Roy Spencer on Monitoring Global Temperature Data since 1979

Have you ever wondered where the term "Carbon Footprint" came from.

Please watch the short video at the link below.  You may be surprised by the answer.

This metric underpins the measurement of progress towards 'Net zero' carbon. But do you think 'Net zero' is the real driver behind measuring our carbon footprint? 

Please see the video below of independent investor Melissa Cuimmei, who gives a different perspective to what you hear in the mainstream media.

According to Melissa, "Net zero is not about saving the planet.  Net zero is about taking control of the food and the energy.  And finding a way to turn that into currency".

"It cannot happen without digital ID.  Digital ID is the last gate that we can rebel at"

Please also see a link below to the full interview, and refer to the Social page of this website for more informaton on Digital ID and the Social Credit system that is integral to the globalists "New World Order" and "The Great Reset" planned by the World Economic Forum.

LINKS:

1. Who Created the Term 'Carbon Footprint'
2. Melissa Cuimmei - You will Rent Everything and Be Happy! - December 2022

The videos below point out the basic truths behind global warming and carbon levels, which do not support the narrative that has been pushed by our governments and mainstream media.

In the first video, Piers Corbyn, the Founder of WeatherAction, claims that the problem with the current climate change narrative is that it is false.  "It claims that carbon dioxide controls, or is the main forcer, of world temperatures, but the actual data shows that it is world temperatures that control carbon dioxide concentration".

The speaker in the second video is Randall Carlson, a researcher with 40+ years of expertise, and no reason to lie.

Many scientists around the world support Mr Carlson's views.  See some of these under supporting evidence below, including Princeton's William Happer.

The video of Professor Happer, at the link below provides detailed analysis and evidence of the myth of carbon pollution. He shows that all the computer models used to predict catastrophic impacts of global warming,  'could hardly be more wrong, and that it is also pretty clear that whatever warming there will be, will be beneficial and lead to huge increases in agricultural productivity as plants will grow better'.

Topics covered by his video include the predictions by Al Gore, and the ideal CO2 level.

Happer notes that the ideal level of CO2 has been 'studied to death' due to the need to understand maximum levels for people in confined spaces such as submarines, where the maximum level allowed is 5000 ppm (parts per million).  Yet climate alarmists are concerned with current levels of 400 ppm.

Happer goes on to discuss what is the ideal level of Carbon.  He explains that at 150 ppm plants stop growing as they are starved to death. 280 ppm were the levels in the 1800's, we are around 400 ppm outside today, and over most of the earth's geological history the levels have been around 1000 to 2000 ppm, and this is what plants prefer and that plants are somewhat starved of CO2 now.

His presentation is well worth watching to explain the true facts behind the climate and temperatures of the earth.

His summary at the end of the presentation is that:

Policies to slow carbon emissions are based on flawed computer models which exaggerate warming by factors of 2 or 3
More carbon is an overall benefit, so costly 'mitigation' schemes are harmful.

He closes with a quote from Schopenhauer:
"All truth passes through 3 stages.  First it is ridiculed, secondly it is violently opposed, and third it is accepted as self-evident".

''The truth, that CO2 is not harmful, but in reality is good for the planet, is somewhere between the stages of ridicule and violent opposition''.

Why is  data and other information from experts who have different views on the current climate agenda, being hidden from the public?  We are told that all scientists agree on the climate agenda, but this is simply not true, so who has decided that the media is only to report one point of view and that any opposing views should be censored or silenced?

Perhaps the answer is summed up by Randall Carlson in the video below, "At this point there is Billions of dollars going into the climate change narrative". 

Perhaps this is some food for thought, as there is no doubt that there are a lot of big companies, governments and individuals who are heavily invested in the current net zero carbon policies.  But as was the case with the Covid pandemic responses, whilst the rich are getting richer from these global agendas being forced on the people, the measures imposed on the people in the name of averting disaster or keeping us safe, lead to  starvation, death and destruction for the lives of millions of people worldwide. 

Australian commentator Alan Jones also questions the CO2 narative with some sobering facts in the X/twitter post linked below.  As he points out
 'CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere.  Human beings create only 3% of that 0.04%.  Is anyone seriously suggesting that we should stand the economy on its head, force up energy prices, damage buusiness, jeopardise employment, because 0.04% of the atmosphere is CO2?'

After considering the information presented here, you may wish to consider whether there really is a climate disaster ahead if we don't reduce carbon levels, or could there be other motives behind this global agenda?

You will also find links to further interviews with Professor Happer under the topic below: Elimination of CO2 is a Suicide Pact!

SUPPORTING EVIDENCE:

1. Princeton's William Happer rebuts myth of carbon pollution
2. John Christy on Making Sense of Data in the Climate Change Debate
3. Australian Broadcaster Alan Jones points out CO2 facts

One of the many 'catastrophies' that we have heard about in recent years, attributed by global powers to 'global warming', is the death of the beautiful coral living in Australia's Great Barrier Reef.

But what the media and climate alarmists conveniently failed to report, is that the Australian Institute of Marine Science annual report in 2022, have found that the Great Barrier Reef central and northern sections now have record coral cover.  A natural event, a Crown of Thorns starfish outbreak, prevented the southern section from also reaching record cover as well.

The facts, as reported at the link below by Australian Senator Roberts, is that natural solar and tidal seasonal events were the cause of the coral bleaching that was previously reported as being due to global warming.

Please watch the video in full for further details.

Keep in mind that this is just one of many supposed man made weather disasters, that turned out not to be a disaster, nor man-made, after all.

You may wish to investigate other widely reported impacts of man on the climate, to find out for yourself the actual data behind such claims. You may be surprised to find that there are many other similar examples, where the facts simply don't support the mainstream media reporting and government policies.

LINK:

1. Great Barrier Reef is NOT Dying - Senator Roberts August 2022

LINK:

1. There is NO Climate Emergency - Dr Judith Curry - November 2022
2. Another skeptical Nobel Laureate of Physics — “Climate science has metastasized”

It’s safe to assume no one consciously sets out to challenge a narrative as deeply entrenched and emotionally charged as climate change.  Dr William Happer, an American physicist and Professor Emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University, certainly didn’t.

It was only in 1991, upon Happer’s appointment by President George W Bush as director of Energy Research in the US Department of Energy, that his interaction with climate change authorities – and their refusal to engage in customary scientific debate on climate change – piqued his interest.

Thereafter, Happer was dismissed for his contrarian views and ‘head butting’ with climate change luminary Al Gore, only to be brought back to Washington by former president Donald Trump in 2018.

At the first link below, BizNews spoke to Happer (83) about his prodigious career and discovery that the burgeoning climate change hysteria had no scientific basis. Happer meticulously detailed why and how CO2, the “demon gas”, is not a pollutant but is essential to mankind’s prosperity.

You should be aware that none of the catastrophic predictions made by Al Gore on climate change eventuated, which adds even more weight to the integrity of the evidence that Professor Happer presents.

The second link is a video of a talk at the National Leadership Symposium of the Hillsdale College in February 2021 on "How to Think About Climate Change"  It is interesting that when the chairman introduced Dr Happer he quoted him as saying that "after his most recent service at the White House, he is more convinced than ever that there is a Deep State (in Washington) and it is much worse than it was 30 years ago".  In his talk, Professor Happer explains how climate enthusiasts who believe there is a climate emergency, have been misled by decades of misinformation.

Professor Happer's presentations are compelling and supported by highly credible data and a lifetime of experience.  Please find some time to watch these videos and decide for yourself whether Professor Happer is a 'climate denier' as some climate alarmists would have you believe, or whether it may be that we are not hearing from the media, the full facts on climate science and particularly on the topic of carbon. 

It is important for people to search out the truth on this topic, as globally, government policies which aim to address 'the problem' of too much carbon, are having catastrophic impacts on the lives of milions of people. 

If experts like Professior Happer and the many scientists who share his views are correct, we are not just unecessarily ruining lives today in the name of reducing carbon and saving the planet, but we are also potentially creating a world where we will starve the crops, plants and trees and actually destroy the planet.

LINKS TO VIDEOS:

1. November 2022 - Prof William Happer - Elimination of CO2 is a Suicide Pact
2. February 2021 - How to think about Climate Change - William Happer

To make wind and solar generators, we actually use more energy to make them, than they will ever produce in their working life.  And we emit more carbon dioxide in making them and maintaining them, than they will ever remit. 

To make it worse, we destroy about 25 hectares for each turbine, we ‘slice and dice’ birds and bats, and 40% of the epoxy used in the laminated blades, is made from a toxic chemical that is banned in many countries in the world, and we cannot recycle the blades.

Please watch the short video below for more facts and decide whether you think wind and solar energy solutions are the right policies for the world’s future energy supply.

Also see the video below from an Australian Ex Government employee who blows the whistle on a purported renewable energy scam in relation to Wind Turbines.

And also consider, why the media is not investigating and reporting important information, about the true costs of renewable energy, which are having such an enormous impact on our lives and the environment.

If we want to have all vehicles electric by 2035, is it practical to do it so?

The simple answer is NO.

There is no such thing as a zero emissions vehicle. So where are the emissions associated with an electric car? Because with an electric vehicle, you don’t eliminate emissions, you export them somewhere else. You have to dig up about 500,000 lbs of materials to make a single 1000 lb battery.

It takes 100 to 300 barrels of oil to manufacture a battery that can hold 1 barrel of oil equivalent of energy. Just manufacturing the battery, can have a carbon debt rate ranging from 10 tons to 40 tons of CO2.  And the plans that are in place to increase the use of batteries will require an increase in production of minerals like Lithium, Cobalt and Zinc. Demand for those minerals will increase between 400% and 4000%. There isn’t enough mining in the world to make enough batteries for that many people for their cars.

The electric car's biggest disadvantage on greenhouse gas emissions is the production of an EV battery, which requires energy-intensive mining and processing, and generates twice as much carbon emissions as the manufacture of an internal combustion engine.  This means that the EV starts off with a bigger carbon footprint than a gasoline-powered car when it rolls off the assembly line, and it takes time to catch up to a gasoline-powered car.

There are also issues with the batteries catching fire and also disposal of the batteries, which have still not been resolved.  As the batteries corrode, fires can start.  This is a new challenge that firefighters haven't faced before on a large scale.  It takes special training and understanding of EVs to ensure these fires are put out quickly and safely.  See also the video below of the electric green scooter 'graveyard' for some insight into the diposal issues.  These scooters have run out of battery life and since it is very expensive to replace the batteries, these scooters are completely abandoned at the end of their battery life.  Also disposing of them in any other way would be dangerous and expensive.

Then of course there is the issue of how to charge the batteries.  This still relies on plugging the car into the power grid, which, as the artilce below shows, can be a problem when governments are shutting down power plants and the grid cannot supply enough power to meet demand.

Please see some articles and videos below with further information on the impacts of Electric Vehicles and lithium batteries on the environment, and ask yourself whether the climate activists and our governments have fully assessed the risks and benefits of electric vehicles and lithium batteries as a future solution to a reliable, sustainable, and environmentally friendly, energy supply.

ARTICLES:

1.  The Key Minerals in an EV Battery
2.  Zero Emissions Electric Vehicles - Here's Why Claim Has Zero Basis
3. Californians Told Not To Charge EVs As Grid Struggles In Heat Wave

Did you know that Bill Gates is the biggest private farmland owner in the US and that he also owns large amounts of farmland in many other countries as well; land which he is taking out of food production?  It seems his plan is to reduce meat production and replace it with fake meat products, products in which he has also invested.

Bill Gates has also famously admitted that his investment in vaccines has been one of his most successful investments due to high profits.  

Is anyone concerned that one man has so much control over the food we eat and the drugs we are being coerced to take through government mandates?

Well many people and organizations are very concerned about the power and control that he has over these industries.  In fact, in November 2022, fifty organizations from around the world who are dedicated to food sovereignty and food justice issues, signed an open letter calling out Bill Gates over his latest claim that technology is the solution to world hunger and food sovereignty.  These organizations are also asking the media to do a better job of covering the issue.

Please see a report from the Children's Health Defense News under supporting evidence below, on this Open Letter, as well as a link to the letter itself.

The CHD article states:

"Fifty organizations dedicated to food sovereignty and food justice issues are calling out Bill Gates over his latest claim that technology is the solution to world hunger and food sovereignty.

In an “open letter” published earlier this month, the groups addressed comments Gates made, during interviews with The New York Times and The Associated Press, about The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 2022 Report.

The letter’s lead authors, Community Alliance for Global Justice/AGRA Watch and the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, wrote:

“In both articles, you make a number of claims that are inaccurate and need to be challenged. Both pieces admit that the world currently produces enough food to adequately feed all the earth’s inhabitants, yet you continue to fundamentally misdiagnose the problem as relating to low productivity; we do not need to increase production as much as to assure more equitable access to food.”

The authors also criticized Gates’ claims that we’ve “underinvested in agricultural innovation” and that the Green Revolution was “one of the greatest things that ever happened.”..............

But the authors of the open letter disagreed:

“There are already many tangible, ongoing proposals and projects that work to boost productivity and food security –– from biofertilizer and biopesticide manufacturing facilities, to agroecological farmer training programs, to experimentation with new water and soil management techniques, low-input farming systems, and pest-deterring plant species.”

They also disagreed with Gates’ claim that the Green Revolution was a “resounding success”:

“.....the Green Revolution......did very little to reduce the number of hungry people in the world or to ensure equitable and sufficient access to food.”

The authors reminded Gates that with the Green Revolution came “a host of other problems, from ecological issues like long-term soil degradation to socio-economic ones like increased inequality and indebtedness (which has been a major contributor to the epidemic of farmer suicides in India).”

They also criticized Gates’ push for genetically modified seeds, stating that “climate-resilient seeds are already in existence and being developed by farmers and traded through informal seed markets.”

“You are part of creating the very problem you name,” the groups wrote. “The AGRA (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa) initiative, which your foundation continues to fund, has also pushed restrictive seed legislation that limits and restricts crop innovation to well-resourced labs and companies.”

These initiatives don’t increase widespread innovation, but rather contribute to the privatization and consolidation of corporate monopolies over seed development and seed markets, they said.

The groups challenged Gates to “step back and learn from those on the ground,” and called on the media to consider how they cover Gates and his vision for the future of food.

They wrote, “we invite high profile news outlets to be more cautious about lending credibility to one wealthy white man’s flawed assumptions, hubris, and ignorance, at the expense of people and communities who are living and adapting to these realities as we speak.”

The Article then went on to reference comments made by Russell Brand, who has the support of over 6 million social media followers.

"Russell Brand sided against Gates and with the authors of the letter, telling viewers:

“It’s a beautiful letter. It’s brilliantly articulate and the reason we want to present it to you today is because it demonstrates that criticizing Bill Gates doesn’t make you a conspiracy theorist and it demonstrates too that Bill Gates’ actions and influence are nefarious and harmful.”

Brand mocked Gates, splicing his YouTube podcast with snippets of the billionaire at his foundation’s recent Goalkeepers 2030 Conference:

“Ah, Bill Gates, he’s the answer to all the world’s problems and anyone who criticizes him is a conspiracy theorist or a considered academic concerned about him colonizing and monopolizing the world’s resources.”

But this “is not a conspiracy theory,” Brand said. “These are harmful policies designed to centralize power and control food, and people are answering back from a position of authority, integrity and expertise.”

He added:

“What you are doing is gaslighting –– presenting practical, ongoing, farmer-led solutions as somehow fanciful or ridiculous, while presenting your own preferred approaches as pragmatic.”

Brand echoed the food sovereignty group’s argument that there are “already measures in place that can be controlled and implemented by the communities themselves and don’t require the centralization of power, the patenting of seeds and crops, the technologicalization of the process of agriculture –– all, by the way –– by a fellow who seems to be buying up farmland at the moment –– by coincidence!”

Brand added:

“Gates likes to look at the world as simple data. What I offer you is this question: Is Bill Gates trying to help? Or is Bill Gates simply suggesting that the solution to all of these problems is to give Bill Gates more power?”

The full CHD article can be found at the link below, which also contains a  link to the Russell Brand video.

Are you also aware that millions of people in the Netherlands have been protesting for months over their governments attempts to reclaim much of their farming land, forcing farmers to reduce a large percentage of their livestock and walk away from their farms?  See separate topic below for further details, but you should note that is becoming a familiar agenda in many countries as governments, global elites and organizations such as the World Economic Forum, are dictating to farmers instead of 'stepping back and listening to those on the ground', as pointed out by the 50 organizations who wrote to Bill Gates.

LINKS:

1. Bill Gates - Farming Technology & Food Sovereignty
2. 10 Oct 2022 Open Letter to Bill Gates on Food, Farming and Africa
3. Jordon Peterson on Bill Gates and Justin Trudeau

The Dutch government said it plans to purchase and forcibly shut down up to 3,000 farms it deems “peak polluters” in order to cut ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions in half by 2030, as required by EU environmental regulations.

Please see at the first link below, a well referenced article by The Children's Health Defense staff, in which they seek to answer the question "What's really driving Netherland's plan to shut down 3,000 farms?"  The article outlines in well referenced detail, what is happening and some possible reasons as to why.  Please read the article in full for more information, but following are some details quoted from the report.

The minister for nature and nitrogen policy, said the government will offer to purchase farms at more than 100% of their value, but if voluntary efforts fail, farmers will face forced buyouts.

The announcement follows months of farmer protests across the country against climate policies they say will force them to kill off livestock and will drive them out of business — policies that some argue also will drive up consumer prices and contribute to the global hunger crisis.  During the protests, Dutch citizens expressed strong support for the farmers

Farmers are furious that the government is offering more lenient regulations to other top industrial polluters, which include the businesses Tata Steel, Schiphol airport, refineries owned by Shell, BP and Esso, Dow chemicals and industrial companies such as Olam Cacoa and Cargill Cacoa.

The Netherlands is one of the most intensely farmed countries in the EU. It has 1.1% of all of the farmland in the EU and produces 6% of the food. 

The Dutch government began implementing new rules on nitrogen activity on farmers that halted the expansion of dairy, pig and poultry operations.

In June 2022, officials announced more plans to cut emissions, which in some areas, means 95% of farming activity must halt within a year.

Protesting farmers have been in talks with the government, but with no agreement.

Protecting nature? Or elite  control of the food system?

Despite obvious impacts on farmer livelihood, a strong resistance movement and the argument that diferent policies could help Dutch farmers substantially reduce emissions, the government insists that buyouts must move forward to protect nature.

Mainstream media has portrayed farmers as anti-environmentalists and conspiracy theorists. But farmers say the new policies are not simply about protecting nature.

Dutch farmer and national farmer organizer Erik Luiten told Nigel Farage:

“There are farmers who are literally living there for centuries … always working with nature, and all of a sudden now they have to disappear because of this ammonia. And the farmers are not against nature, never against nature. They have to live in nature and they … have to work with nature. But it’s unbelievable that … now they have to get away … so close to nature and farmers are not convinced that it is going to help nature. …

“Europe says you have to preserve nature. … The Dutch government only made nitrogen, oxygen and ammonia as the only … elements which will tell you if nature is well preserved, and that’s absolutely crazy.”

Farmers argue that more is at stake in the buyout than the future of Dutch farming.

Global bodies and programs, such as the World Bank’s Climate-Smart Agriculture and Protected Areas Initiative, the European Commission and NGOs, like the World Wide Fund For Nature, that support this "agri-transition" are implementing a comprehensive policy targeting Dutch farmers, and farmers across the world, using “biodiversity” and “climate” protection as a pretext for taking land as part of a larger project to re-make agriculture, according to a recent report by The Grayzone.

The Sri Lankan government conducted a similar experiment earlier this year, eliminating nitrogen-based fertilizer, which led to a famine that toppled the government. The Irish government also warned farmers that they must cut emissions or face consequences.

Agricultural researcher, permaculturalist and author Christian Westbrook — also known as the “Ice Age Farmer” —  explained in an episode of “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast,” how the Rockerfeller Foundation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have long pushed the idea of a so-called Green Revolution.

Westbrook warned that narratives crafted to appeal to “green consumers” disguise a more nefarious intent on the part of the global elite who, in fact, are in the process of launching a “hostile takeover” of the global food system.

The global elites have used their influence over multilateral institutions to propose a series of top-down technocratic transformations of the global food system that will consolidate their control over global agriculture and limit farmer autonomy in the name of protecting the planet from environmental and climate destruction.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) — a neo-liberal public-private partnership that seeks to “define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda” — has proposed that farmers embrace “climate-smart” methods to completely transform agriculture to “net-zero, nature positive food systems” by 2030.

Sieta van Keimpema, spokesperson for the Farmers Defence Force, discussed the links between the WEF and Dutch politicians with The Grayzone:

“Left-wing parties like Democrats 66 [that promise] we’ll be working towards reducing the cattle population by half … are very close to Klaus Schwab [WEF founder] …

“They go to Davos and don’t deny it. It’s a fact that the WEF is pushing legislation that isn’t decided in a democratic way.

“The farmers have seen what is happening with the World Economic Forum, with Bill Gates, etc. … that’s why they are so active …

“They know that what they are fighting is a very strong lobby of multinationals who really want to control food.”

Please also see other links and videos below on this topic including details of the farmer protests and the victory of the Farmer-Citizens movement in the 2023 Dutch elections.

Food is at the very core of survival for humanity, so it is important for all to understand that this is not just an issue for the Netherlands, but for all countries whose governments seek to align with the WEF and other powerful elites, whose plans for the world threaten our food supply.

LINKS:

1. What’s Really Driving Netherlands’ Plan to Shut Down 3,000 Farms? • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)
2. 'War against humanity’: Netherlands to shut down 3,000 farms
3. Netherlands to forcefully shut down 3,000 farms

The story below will be of particular interest to Australian landowners.  This is the story of one farmer, whose family has had farming rights over his farmland since 1835.  He is the biggest landowner in the area, and his land is used both for his home and his family farming business, with the expectation that he would pass it onto his children.

His land sits on the main residential growth corridor for a fast growing city, Port Macquarie.  The local council has publicy exhibited his land in its'entirety, for proposed environmental rezoning without any consultation with him. Despite his protests, this publicly available 'draft plan' has been on display for 2 years. This rezoning would mean that the land can no longer be used for farming.

He explains how this action has impacted him and his family and the 'sneaky' tactics that the local Council is using to try to take his land from him. 

Fake meat is promoted as a healthy alternative for natural meat, but the industry's fake meat is just another name for ultra-processed food, full of GE (genetically engineered) and pesticide-laden ingredients designed to look as much like meat as possible.

Please click on the link below for a well referenced article by Dr Joseph Mercola on this topic.  We encourage you to read the article in full, but to quote highlights from the article, here is the Story at a glance:

• Ultra-processed foods typically have five or more ingredients, many of which are not commonly used in home kitchens. This aptly describes the Impossible Burger and Beyond Burger, including fake blood processed from genetically engineered yeast to mimic the taste and texture of real beef.
• Although the soy-like hemoglobin used in the Impossible Burger is classified as generally recognized as safe, no tests have been done by independent labs on the product’s safety. However, tests on lab rats altered the animals’ blood chemistry; the company did not follow up on the results.
• The parent companies for Impossible Burger and Beyond Burger commissioned studies to assess the environmental impact of production against typical concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) beef production. Not surprisingly, they found their product had a lower impact. But it’s not nearly as low as the beef production at White Oaks Pastures, which uses regenerative farming practices to produce natural beef products.
• If a plant-based, genetically engineered (GE) meat alternative is not enough of a science fiction adventure, consider the “meat” scientists are growing from stem cell cultures in the lab. Some see these alternatives as the lesser of two evils, but when holistic herd management improves the environment, your best choice is to seek food from natural sources.

You may also find it interesting that billionaires Bill Gates and Richard Branson, have invested in fake meat products.  In the article linked below, Bill Gates claims that we will not be able to produce enough real meat for 9 billion people. Is this true? What evidence does he have to support this claim? We are feeding 8 billion people now, and government data from around the world shows that in many countries the population is actually decreasing, as are fertility rates, so when do we even expect to reach 9 billion people.

Bill Gates was wrong about the effectiveness of the Covid vaccines, from which he profited handsomely.  So there is good reason to  question the data behind his claims. 

It is certainly true that the government of the Netherlands are trying to force farmers off their land and to kill significant numbers of their animals, in the name of saving the planet.  Could this be why Bill Gates thinks we can't produce enought meat, because governments are forcing the farmers to kill their animals?

It is important to look into these issues and not simply accept everything that the global elites and those in power tell us.  What do you think, will you and your family be happy to eat fake meat?

LINKS:

1. April 2022 Dr Joseph Mercola: The Fake Meat Scam
2. Bill Gates and Richard Branson bet on lab-grown meat startup

The video at the link below by former Australian parliamentarian George Christensen, is one of many videos and articles available, that provide a good overview of "The Great Reset" proposed by Klauss Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

In a nutshell, the proposal is to build a 'New World Order' in which 'You will own nothing, and be happy', because whenever you need anything, you simply order it and it arrives.

To some, this may sound like a nice world to live in, but be warned, there are some important consquences that come with this way of life.

In particular on the issues of food and energy, we are already seeing some shocking impacts of attempts to move to this new world order.

As outlined in the video, as well as under other topics on this website, we are already seeing significant impacts on farmers and consequently our food supply, as governments in the Netherlands and Canada, seek to shut down farms and kill livestock, in the name of reducing global warming.  Meanwhile food manufacturing plants are mysteriously burning down and we are being encouraged to eat fake meat and food made from insects and bugs.
 
On the energy front, it is predicted that thousands of people across Europe could die from the cold this winter, due to the shutdown of coal fired energy plants and the push towards renewable energy and reduction of fossil fuel use.

Please go to the Society page of this website for more informaton on other significant impacts of The Great Reset, including the introduction of a 'social credit system' similar to that which already exists in China, and the move towards 'transhumanism'.

If you believe that the New World Order will not really impact you, or that there is nothing you can do to about it anyway, so there is no need to inform yourself; please stop and think about the numerous recent examples of 'trial runs' of parts of this agenda, where governments all around the world have taken away our human rights and exerted significant control over the way we live.

Fortunately many people have risen up, and continue to rise up and protest against government overreach into their lives.  Without these protests, the Great Reset most likely would already be much more progressed by now. 

So it is important that you do inform yourself and your friends and family about the plans of the WEF to build a 'New World Order', to ensure that we the people, don't become enslaved by a very small minority of global elites.

Please also see some more specific examples in topics below of how the WEF is already influencing key goverment policies that are affecting the way people live.  These examples clearly demonstrate that the WEF plans are already in progress, this is not some future event that may or may not come along.

And remember that the WEF is a group of unelected global elites and major corporations; their agenda is not being driven by the people through our elected government representatives.

1. Understanding "The Great Reset" by George Christensen - September 2022

USEFUL LINKS:

1. The World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
2. George Christensen Website

One of the topics on the WEF website is "Agriculture, Food and Beverage".  They state their mission for this sector is:

LINK:

1. Australian Senator Roberts: The Great Resist - November 2022

In the introduction to this section of the website, you will find a video of Klauss Schwab, boasting how proud he is that he has been able to 'infiltrate' the cabinets of governments around the world.

As we also pointed out in the introduction, the WEF did not infiltrate the cabinets, after the people elected their leaders.  Rather, the WEF apparently 'prepared' these people for their leadership roles, before the people even knew that they were going to 'elect' these leaders. It would be interesting to understand how the WEF knew ahead of time, that these people would be elected into roles of such significant power. 

Please click on the Link below to see more information about how Klauss Schwab achieved this 'infiltration' through the WEF's 'Young Global Leaders Program", and how these leaders have surprisingly similar policies for their sovereign countries.

LINK:

1. The GREAT RESET Has INFILTRATED Political Cabinets & Celebrities

The video at the link below is an interesting presentation by Dr Jordan Peterson and Dr Bjorn Lomborg of an article they published on 4th November 2022 in The Telegraph, on 'How those who hypothetically lead us on the environmental front are actually failing to save the planet' at the 2022 UN Climate Change Conference in Egypt - the 27th such conference, known as COP 27.

They discuss how "very little has been accomplished and much time and money wasted.  They suggest that perhaps 'insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results', might very well become the unofficial motto of the Climate Change Conference.

Dr Lomborg begins by stating that "...in the previous 10 years, the world has focused more on remediating climate change than ever before.  Despite this, we are not achieving anything, although no shortage of money has been wasted.  And in a surprisingly honest review of climate policies, the UN revealed a lost decade.... the report found that it couldn't tell the difference between what has happened, and a world that adopted no new climate policies since 2005.... all those climate summits and grandiose promises, all that expense and trouble, and no measurable difference whatsoever".

They go on to discuss the reasons for this failure to achieve measurable results, including the impossibility of replacing our energy needs with renewable energy based on today's technology, and they propose different approaches and factors to consider going forward.

ARTICLE:

1. Dr Jordon Peterson and Dr Lomborg Discuss How Those Who Hypothetically Lead us on the Environmental Front are actually Failing to Save The Planet

Did you know that the fluoride that many governments around the world add to public water supplies, is not the same pharmaceutical grade fluoride that we get in toothpaste or other dental products?  They don't use this because it would be too expensive.

So what do they use?  It is in fact a hazardous waste product from the phosphate fertilizer industry.  You may find this hard to believe but it is true.

Please see the video below for detailed information on the fluoride that public water agencies put in our drinking water, including the fact that it is illegal for the phosphate fertilizer companies to dump this waste product into the oceans or rivers, but if they sell it to someone, it becomes a product which is governed by different laws.  This makes no sense, as it is still a dangerous, toxic product.

Millions of people around the world have been protesting for decades about governments adding fluoride to their drinking water.

Fortunately many countries, including much of Europe, have rejected proposals to add fluoride to their public water supply, but in some countries the industry powers have strong lobby groups that have convinced governments that this toxic chemical which is illegal to dump in waterways, is safe for people to drink.  This is very alarming, when even fluoride toothpaste has a warning on it not to swallow (if you check you will find the warning in very tiny print).

Please also see a link below to a website which provides further information on fluoride, to help you inform yourself on this important topic which could significantly impact the health of you and your children.  A few facts from the website include:

QUICK FACTS

• 97% of Western Europe has rejected water fluoridation
• Many children now exceed recommended daily fluoride intake from toothpaste alone
• Fluoride is NOT a nutrient
• 64 Studies have linked fluoride with reduced IQ in children

Also below is a link to an activist documentary, Fire Water: Australia’s Industrial Fluoridation Disgrace. Since that time, the film and related materials have received widespread support and in excess of 100,000 views online. According to The Australian Fluoridation News:

“This important Australian film brings to the fore many of the key fluoridation issues not usually mentioned in the mainstream media… it shines in bringing together some of the many voices from around Australia – a cross section of researchers, politicians, activists, sufferers and health professionals… a springboard to the next level of raising fluoridation awareness. The interviews are GOLD.”

The Fire Water Project encompasses not only the official full-length documentary, but additional interviews, related documentation, and the ongoing efforts to expose the fluoridation fraud both in Australia and internationally. Fire Water is now more than a film – it is an exponentially expanding grass roots movement to end fluoridation once and for all.

Whilst this is a film focused on the issue in Australia, the information in this film applies to many other countries around the world. 

Does your city or town water contain fluoride?  You may want to find out and consider whether you believe it is acceptable for your government to add toxic chemical waste to your water.
 

Could the information in the video below be true?  Is Primary water one of the top five most kept secrets on earth?  Is it created deep within the earth from the synthesis of hydrogen and oxygen?  Under tremendous pressure from the Earth’s internal heat, is H2O in the form of vapour forced up through the rock fissures, becoming liquid as it cools?

There is the potential that there is more primary water in the Earth’s crust than there is water in all of the oceans.  If these claims are true, imagine if people new about the unlimited supply of primary water available and were allowed to drill down far enough to access it.

You may find some of the information in the video below worth researching further. 

Chemtrails refers to the 'trail of chemicals' that remain in the sky after 'spraying', which sink slowly to cover the earth below.  These chemicals are usually sprayed by 'weather modification programs'.

Chemtrails affect the very air that we breathe, so this topic is important to every living thing on earth and is surely worth some consideration.  These chemicals are breathed in by people, plants and animals, and can potentially cause significant harm and health issues, as well as affect the cultivation of plants and food.

And for those who think it is a conspiracy theory, you can receive a degree at Harvard University for Geo-engineering (weather manipulation via aerosolized agents).

It is surprising that so many people believe that chemtrails and weather modification are stories by conspiracy theorists, when there is a large body of evidence pertaining to them.  For example, see below a presentation at a United Nations Council Assembly meeting in 2006 on chemtrails and weather modifications programs done by both governments and private companies.  The presentation outlines that these chemicals have a detrimental effect on agriculture and yet these weather modification programs spraying these chemicals have no regulatory oversight.

Other articles below include a petition to stop chemtrails in Texas; evidence presented by Doctors, Pilots and Scientists in 2014 telling the truth about chemtrails; and an article about vaccinating people and animals using aerial vaccines.

There are also videos below of whistleblowers raising concerns about these practices and the potential harm to people and the environment.

Please review these articles and do your own research to determine for yourself whether we should be demanding more information from our governments about weather modification programs and the chemicals that they are spraying in our atmosphere. 

ARTICLES:

1. 2006 United Nations Chemtrail Presentation
2. https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/petition-for-clean-texas-skies
3. From 2014: Pilots, Doctors & Scientists Tell the Truth About Chemtrails
4. Australia To Forcibly Vaccinate Citizens Via Chemtrails | WorldTruth.Tv 

This is a topic which most of the population considers to be the domain of 'tin foil hat wearers'.  But many experts and some whistleblowers have revealed that there are genuine health concerns around microwave and 5G radiation which should be brought to the attention of the public and addressed.

See a brief video below which outlines how the 5G 'Smart Grid' will be used for total surveillance of the population, a topic covered elsewhere on this website.  But it also touches on how 5G can be used as a weapon and the damage it can do to us biologically. 

More Information will be added soon on this topic.